ci: all-platform node binaries in the signed release manifest; signed SHA256SUMS for the archives; web build once before the parallel backend builds; release 0.3.3 [CI SKIP]

This commit is contained in:
justme committed 2026-10-08 16:26:29 +08:00
1 parent cab505b837
commit 5ab589ade6
9 files changed
+134 -10

No files matched your search

+2
View File
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ steps:
GITEA_BASE: http://127.0.0.1:3100
GITEA_TOKEN:
from_secret: gitea_token
RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY:
from_secret: release_signing_key
commands:
- bash ci/publish-gitea-release.sh
depends_on:
+14 -3
View File
@@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ when:
concurrency: 1
steps:
# 前端先打包好(几十秒),两个架构的 Backend 构建再并行:它们把 web/*/dist 内嵌进程序,只读这份产物,不再各自 npm ci
# (并行的两个 npm ci 会同时删 node_modules,互相搞坏)。步骤加了超时:卡住就几分钟内失败,不是耗着。
- name: web-build
image: bash
environment:
NPM_CONFIG_CACHE: /home/justme/.npm
commands:
- npm ci --prefix web --prefer-offline
- timeout 600 npm run build --prefix web
depends_on: []
- name: linux-amd64-backend
image: bash
environment:
@@ -25,7 +36,8 @@ steps:
from_secret: zot_secret
commands:
- bash ci/release-linux.sh amd64 backend
depends_on: []
depends_on:
- web-build
- name: linux-arm64-backend
image: bash
@@ -36,10 +48,9 @@ steps:
ZOT_SECRET:
from_secret: zot_secret
commands:
# 两个架构共用一个工作目录:amd64 先构建并生成前端产物,arm64 在它之后(并行会同时 npm ci,互相删 node_modules)
- bash ci/release-linux.sh arm64 backend
depends_on:
- linux-amd64-backend
- web-build
- name: backend-multiarch-index
image: bash
+1 -1
View File
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
<UseArtifactsOutput>true</UseArtifactsOutput>
<ArtifactsPath>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)artifacts</ArtifactsPath>
<Deterministic>true</Deterministic>
<Version>0.3.2</Version>
<Version>0.3.3</Version>
<NuGetAudit>false</NuGetAudit>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
+36
View File
@@ -114,4 +114,40 @@ for pid in "${pids[@]}"; do
wait "$pid"
done
# 所有压缩包的校验和汇成一份 SHA256SUMS,用发布私钥签名(base64 的 DER ECDSA,和签名的发布清单是同一把密钥、同一种格式):
# 不走容器的安装(直接下载压缩包)先验这份签名再核对压缩包的哈希,发布页被改也骗不到;没有配置签名密钥(例如 fork)就跳过。
upload_local_asset() {
local name="$1" file="$2" upload_response="$tmp/$1.upload.json" status
if grep -Eq "\"name\"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*\"$name\"" "$assets_json"; then
echo "release asset $name already exists; keeping the existing asset"
return 0
fi
status="$(curl --silent --show-error --retry 3 --netrc-file "$netrc" \
--request POST --header 'Content-Type: application/octet-stream' --data-binary "@$file" \
--output "$upload_response" --write-out '%{http_code}' "$api/releases/$release_id/assets?name=$name")"
[[ "$status" == 2* ]] || { echo "Gitea Release asset upload failed for $name (HTTP $status)" >&2; cat "$upload_response" >&2; return 1; }
echo "attached $name"
}
if [[ -n "${RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY:-}" ]]; then
sums="$tmp/SHA256SUMS"
: > "$sums"
for archive in "${assets[@]}"; do
curl --fail --silent --show-error --retry 3 --netrc-file "$netrc" \
"$gitea_base/api/packages/justme/generic/moshiro-node/$version/$archive.sha256" -o "$tmp/$archive.sha256"
cat "$tmp/$archive.sha256" >> "$sums"
done
[[ "$(wc -l < "$sums")" -eq "${#assets[@]}" ]] || { echo "SHA256SUMS does not have one line per archive" >&2; exit 1; }
signing_key="$(mktemp)"
chmod 600 "$signing_key"
printf '%s\n' "$RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY" > "$signing_key"
openssl dgst -sha256 -sign "$signing_key" -out "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig.bin" "$sums"
rm -f "$signing_key"
base64 -w0 "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig.bin" > "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig" 2>/dev/null || base64 "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig.bin" | tr -d '\n' > "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig"
upload_local_asset SHA256SUMS "$sums"
upload_local_asset SHA256SUMS.sig "$tmp/SHA256SUMS.sig"
else
echo "release signing is not configured; SHA256SUMS is not signed"
fi
echo "published Gitea Release $tag: https://git.oeo.one/justme/MoShiro/releases/tag/$tag"
+31
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# 一个组件在所有平台、所有架构的发布压缩包里的可执行文件的 SHA-256(逗号分隔,输出到标准输出)。
# ci/release-binary-hashes.sh <agent|probe> <版本,不带 v> 环境变量:GITEA_BASE、NETRC(curl 的 netrc 文件)
# 签名的发布清单里的 binaries 就是它:节点握手时上报正在运行的可执行文件的哈希,Backend 凭 CI 签名的清单认「官方二进制」——
# 容器、Linux glibc/musl 压缩包、macOS、Windows 的 x64/arm64 都一样,不只是容器镜像里的那两个。
set -euo pipefail
component="${1:?usage: release-binary-hashes.sh <agent|probe> <version>}"; version="${2:?version}"
[[ "$component" =~ ^(agent|probe)$ ]] || { echo "component must be agent or probe" >&2; exit 2; }
gitea_base="${GITEA_BASE:?GITEA_BASE is required}"; gitea_base="${gitea_base%/}"
netrc=(); [[ -n "${NETRC:-}" ]] && netrc=(--netrc-file "$NETRC")
work="$(mktemp -d)"
trap 'rm -rf "$work"' EXIT
# 和 ci/publish-gitea-release.sh 里发布的那 8 种一样(每个组件)
targets=(linux-amd64 linux-arm64 linux-musl-amd64 linux-musl-arm64 macos-x64 macos-arm64 windows-amd64 windows-arm64)
hashes=()
for target in "${targets[@]}"; do
if [[ "$target" == windows-* ]]; then archive="moshiro-$component-v$version-$target.zip"; member="moshiro-$component.exe"
else archive="moshiro-$component-v$version-$target.tar.gz"; member="moshiro-$component"; fi
curl --fail --silent --show-error --retry 3 ${netrc[@]+"${netrc[@]}"} "$gitea_base/api/packages/justme/generic/moshiro-node/$version/$archive" -o "$work/$archive"
if [[ "$archive" == *.zip ]]; then
hash="$(cd "$work" && python3 -c 'import hashlib,sys,zipfile; print(hashlib.sha256(zipfile.ZipFile(sys.argv[1]).read(sys.argv[2])).hexdigest())' "$archive" "$member")"
else
hash="$(tar -xzOf "$work/$archive" "$member" | sha256sum | cut -d' ' -f1)"
fi
[[ "$hash" =~ ^[0-9a-f]{64}$ ]] || { echo "could not hash $member in $archive" >&2; exit 1; }
hashes+=("$hash")
rm -f "$work/$archive"
done
# 不同平台的二进制哈希不会相同;去重只是防御
printf '%s\n' "${hashes[@]}" | sort -u | paste -sd,
+3 -4
View File
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ build_arch_image() {
"$gitea_base/api/packages/justme/generic/moshiro-node/$version/$filename" -o "$archive"
mkdir -p "$context/app" "$context/config"
tar -xzf "$archive" -C "$work" "moshiro-$component" fleet-enroll
# 镜像里装的就是这个文件:它的哈希写进签名的发布清单(binaries),节点握手时上报正在运行的二进制的哈希,面板据此认「官方二进制」
sha256sum "$work/moshiro-$component" | cut -d' ' -f1 >> "$work/$component.hashes"
install -m 0755 "$work/fleet-enroll" "$context/app/fleet-enroll"
install -m 0755 "$work/moshiro-$component" "$context/app/moshiro-$component"
: > "$context/config/.keep"
@@ -112,7 +110,6 @@ publish_index() {
}
for component in agent probe; do
rm -f "$work/$component.hashes"
build_arch_image "$component" amd64 musl-amd64
build_arch_image "$component" arm64 musl-arm64
publish_index "$component"
@@ -120,6 +117,8 @@ for component in agent probe; do
# 没有配置签名密钥(例如 fork)就只发镜像、不发清单。
if [[ -n "${RELEASE_SIGNING_KEY:-}" ]]; then
digest="$(cat "$work/$component.digest")"
RELEASE_BINARIES="$(paste -sd, "$work/$component.hashes")" bash "$root/ci/publish-release-offer.sh" "$component" "$image_root/moshiro-$component" "$digest" "$tag" release "$work/$component-release"
# 清单里的 binaries:所有平台、所有架构的发布压缩包里的可执行文件(不只是镜像里的 musl 那两个),节点握手时上报的哈希对得上其中任何一个
binaries="$(NETRC="$netrc" GITEA_BASE="$gitea_base" bash "$root/ci/release-binary-hashes.sh" "$component" "$version")"
RELEASE_BINARIES="$binaries" bash "$root/ci/publish-release-offer.sh" "$component" "$image_root/moshiro-$component" "$digest" "$tag" release "$work/$component-release"
fi
done
+43
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# release-binary-hashes.sh 的测试:用本地的假 Gitea 包仓库(python http.server),造 8 个平台的压缩包(tar.gz 和 zip),
# 核对脚本算出来的哈希就是压缩包里可执行文件的 SHA-256。运行:bash ci/tests/binary-hashes-test.sh
set -eu
ROOT="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")/../.." && pwd)"
T="$(mktemp -d)"
SERVER=
trap '[ -z "$SERVER" ] || kill "$SERVER" 2>/dev/null || true; rm -rf "$T" 2>/dev/null || true' EXIT
V=9.9.9
PKG="$T/srv/api/packages/justme/generic/moshiro-node/$V"
mkdir -p "$PKG"
fail=0
expected=()
for component in agent probe; do
for target in linux-amd64 linux-arm64 linux-musl-amd64 linux-musl-arm64 macos-x64 macos-arm64 windows-amd64 windows-arm64; do
stage="$T/stage-$component-$target"; mkdir -p "$stage"
if [[ "$target" == windows-* ]]; then member="moshiro-$component.exe"; else member="moshiro-$component"; fi
printf 'binary of %s for %s\n' "$component" "$target" > "$stage/$member"
printf 'noise' > "$stage/fleet-enroll"; printf 'readme' > "$stage/README.md"
if [[ "$target" == windows-* ]]; then
(cd "$stage" && python3 -c "import zipfile,sys; z=zipfile.ZipFile('out.zip','w'); [z.write(n) for n in sys.argv[1:]]" "$member" fleet-enroll README.md && mv out.zip "$PKG/moshiro-$component-v$V-$target.zip")
else
tar -czf "$PKG/moshiro-$component-v$V-$target.tar.gz" -C "$stage" "$member" fleet-enroll README.md
fi
[[ "$component" == agent ]] && expected+=("$(sha256sum "$stage/$member" | cut -d' ' -f1)")
done
done
want="$(printf '%s\n' "${expected[@]}" | sort -u | paste -sd,)"
(cd "$T/srv" && python3 -u -m http.server 0 --bind 127.0.0.1 >"$T/server.log" 2>&1 & echo $! > "$T/pid")
SERVER="$(cat "$T/pid")"
for _ in $(seq 1 50); do port="$(grep -o 'port [0-9]*' "$T/server.log" | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f2 || true)"; [[ -n "$port" ]] && break; sleep 0.2; done
[[ -n "${port:-}" ]] || { echo "FAIL the fake package server did not start"; cat "$T/server.log"; exit 1; }
got="$(GITEA_BASE="http://127.0.0.1:$port" bash "$ROOT/ci/release-binary-hashes.sh" agent "$V")"
if [[ "$got" == "$want" ]]; then echo "ok agent: all 8 platform binaries hashed ($(echo "$got" | tr ',' '\n' | wc -l) distinct)"; else echo "FAIL agent hashes differ"; echo " want $want"; echo " got $got"; fail=1; fi
[[ "$(echo "$got" | tr ',' '\n' | wc -l)" -eq 8 ]] && echo "ok eight different binaries, none dropped" || { echo "FAIL expected 8 hashes"; fail=1; }
# 缺一个平台的压缩包:整个脚本失败,不能悄悄少签一个
rm "$PKG/moshiro-probe-v$V-macos-arm64.tar.gz"
if GITEA_BASE="http://127.0.0.1:$port" bash "$ROOT/ci/release-binary-hashes.sh" probe "$V" >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "FAIL a missing archive was ignored"; fail=1; else echo "ok a missing archive fails the script instead of signing fewer binaries"; fi
if bash "$ROOT/ci/release-binary-hashes.sh" other "$V" >/dev/null 2>&1; then echo "FAIL unknown component accepted"; fail=1; else echo "ok unknown component is refused"; fi
exit "$fail"
+3 -1
View File
@@ -337,7 +337,9 @@ CI 给每个镜像的 digest 签名之后,除了(面板在线时)登记给
- **更新器**:配置里 `FEED=auto`(默认)时先看仓库里的清单,验签通过才用;取不到或验不过就用面板放进信箱的那份。`MANIFEST_REF` 可以指定清单镜像,`FEED=off` 关掉;通道取配置里的 `CHANNEL`,没有就按仓库路径推断(`moshiro-dev` → dev,`moshiro` → release)。仓库里的清单验签失败而信箱里又没有东西时,状态会报「无效清单」而不是悄悄当作没有更新。
- **面板自己取**:安装脚本向面板要某个组件的签名清单时,面板里没有(清过库、CI 登记那一步网络失败)或者已经放了十分钟以上,面板就按 OCI 分发协议**匿名**读一次仓库里的清单镜像(只读清单和它的配置两个小 JSON,不拉镜像层),用内嵌的 CI 发布公钥验过签才登记;验不过(仓库或路上被改)就当没有。所以清库之后不用手工补登记,也不会被一份伪造的清单骗到。仓库要匿名可读(`moshiro/**`、`moshiro-dev/**`)。
- **没有宿主机更新器的节点**(一键容器安装、二进制安装)握手时带不来清单:面板用自己手里(登记时验过 CI 签名)的那份把节点的二进制标成「已签名」;不在清单里的只是不标「已签名」,不会因此被拒绝。
- **发版**:打 `vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH` tag 时,节点镜像(Agent、Probe 的多架构镜像)也和 Backend 一样签清单,清单里带两个架构的二进制哈希,放到 `moshiro/…-manifest:release`。
- **发版**:打 `vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH` tag 时,节点镜像(Agent、Probe 的多架构镜像)也和 Backend 一样签清单,放到 `moshiro/…-manifest:release`。清单里的 `binaries` 是**所有平台、所有架构**的发布压缩包里可执行文件的 SHA-256(Linux glibc 和 musl、macOS、Windows,x64 和 arm64,每个组件 8 个,`ci/release-binary-hashes.sh`),不只是容器镜像里的那两个:节点握手时上报正在运行的可执行文件的哈希,Backend 凭 CI 签名的清单认「官方二进制」,所以容器和直接下载压缩包安装的节点是一回事。
- **压缩包的校验和也签名**:Release 里除了每个压缩包的 `.sha256`,还有汇总的 `SHA256SUMS` 和 `SHA256SUMS.sig`(用发布私钥签,base64 的 DER ECDSA P-256,和清单同一把密钥)。验证:`base64 -d SHA256SUMS.sig > s.bin && openssl dgst -sha256 -verify packaging/update/release-key.pub.pem -signature s.bin SHA256SUMS`,通过之后再 `sha256sum -c SHA256SUMS`。macOS 的 Developer ID 签名和公证、Windows 的 Authenticode 需要苹果和微软的证书,目前没有做。
- 测试:`bash ci/tests/binary-hashes-test.sh`(本地的假包仓库,8 种平台的 tar.gz 和 zip,缺任何一个压缩包都会失败,不会悄悄少签)。
- **首次部署**:`deploy-node.sh` 默认就走这条路,不需要面板,也不用手动指定镜像(Backend 第一次部署时本来就没有面板)。`--tag` 指定标签时不验签并有警告;`--image` 直接用你给的引用。
- **别人自己部署后端,什么都不用改**:仓库对匿名读开放(`moshiro/*` 和各 `*-manifest` 仓库),然后 `sudo sh deploy-node.sh backend --channel release --public-url https://<自己的域名>`,只是配置,不改代码、不需要自己的 CI;passkey 绑定在自己的域名上。自己 fork 并自建镜像的人要换自己的发布公钥和仓库地址(`--image-repo`)并重新构建,这是 fork 的正常代价。
- 测试:`bash packaging/update/tests/feed-test.sh`(假的 podman + 真的 openssl,覆盖篡改、别的密钥、旧 seq、换钥、仓库不可用回退、首次部署的验签)。
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "moshiro-web",
"private": true,
"version": "0.3.2",
"version": "0.3.3",
"workspaces": [
"display",
"admin"